GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

[Steven Bosscher]

On Tuesday 17 May 2005 00:07, Joe Buck wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 10:15:29PM +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> > On Monday 16 May 2005 20:26, Karel Gardas wrote:
> > > On Mon, 16 May 2005, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> > > > Just for the record, attached is gcctest's history of the overall
> > > > memory requirement at -O[0123] for combine.i, insn-attrtab.i, and
> > > > generate.ii (aka PR8361).  Honza's bot has been sending these
> > > > reports since Septemper 2004, so that's where I started.
> > >
> > > Is it possible to also add -Os to your tested option set? IMHO this
> > > option is quite necessary for embedded developers who seems to complain
> > > in this thread.
> >
> > Not interesting.  -Os is basically -O2 with some passes disabled.
>
> That's not quite correct.  For example, the rule -Os uses for considering
> inlining is completely different (inlining is allowed when the size of
> generated code does not increase).

...meaning that the memory footprint at -Os is going to be smaller 
than the -O2 print for all but a few strange cases.

Gr.
Steven