Backporting to 4_0 the latest friend bits
Mark Mitchell
mark@codesourcery.com
Mon May 2 19:35:00 GMT 2005
Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
>
>>I agree; that's why I asked to see the patches.
>
>
> Humm, maybe a couple of links are in order, for your convenience:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-03/msg00681.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-03/msg00679.html
>
> (I understand that Kriang volunteered to regtest and, if necessary (most
> likely not) tweak the patches for actual 4.0 inclusion)
Those are somewhat above my pain threshold. Is there something else
that we could do for the 4.0 branch? Like issue a warning and ignore
the friend declaration? Am I correct in understand that the problem
case is that the friend declaration looks like "friend class C" where
there is a C in a containing scope, but no C in the class with the
friend declaration?
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304
More information about the Gcc
mailing list