PR 20505

[James E Wilson]

Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> Being conservative I'd go for my patch on 4.0 and yours (if verified) on
> mainline.

I'm fine with that.  Have you actually written a patch yet?  I don't see 
one in the bug report or in gcc-patches.

I found a complication with my patch (string constants) when 
bootstrapping, and I plan to fix it by reorganizing the code a bit, so 
my patch will definitately not be a good idea for the 4.0 branch when I 
am done.
-- 
Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.SpecifixInc.com