ISO C prototype style for libiberty?
DJ Delorie
dj@redhat.com
Mon Mar 28 08:56:00 GMT 2005
> Isn't that what newlib is for...?
"Should be" does not mean "is". I know libiberty has been used for
this purpose in the past (remember the demangler in libstdc++ times?)
so I wouldn't want to assume we aren't still doing it.
> I should be clear, though; I only want to make this assumption for
> the host and build systems.
That's hard for libiberty, where it is also used for target systems.
More information about the Gcc
mailing list