ISO C prototype style for libiberty?

[Gabriel Dos Reis]

DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com> writes:

| >   Would there be any objection to patches that convert function
| > definitions in libiberty to use ISO C prototype style, instead of 
| > K&R style?
| 
| I would be in support of such a patch iff it converts all the
| functions, not just the ones gcc happens to use.

Just to make sure I understand.  I was thinking of whatever was under
$GCC/libiberty (and included).  Are you thinking of something more?
A single patch is a huge stuff; I propose to break it into a series of
patches.  Is that OK with you?

-- Gaby