GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24)

[Eric Botcazou]

> OK.  (FWIW, you're not on the CC: list for that PR either.)

No, but I'm the assignee so... :-)

> > Note that the patch has been approved by Roger for 4.x, so it should
> > already have been checked in, had I not run into technical contingencies
> > lately.
>
> Great; I shan't second-guess then.

Sorry, I only wanted to explain why the patch is still pending.  About your 
question: am I right in thinking that the real name is the name as written 
in the assembly file?  If so, that's what is now implemented in 4.x.

> > However the same problem is present in 3.4.x for the C++ compiler (but
> > is not a regression there) so I'd like you to make a decision for that
> > branch too.
>
> I'd prefer not to apply this for 3.4.

Agreed.

-- 
Eric Botcazou