help with mudflap testsuite result analysis

[Mike Stump]

On Thursday, March 17, 2005, at 11:37  AM, Mike Stump wrote:

> So, I've been working on mudflap for darwin8, and these are the 
> results I get...  I know what you're thinking, it's impossible to get 
> it working because it doesn't have --wrap and friends..  well, I 
> pulled some magic pixie dust out and sprinkled it around and it's 
> starting to work...
>
> The question is, how decent are the results and can you spot any 
> systematic wrongs that appear and/or can you identify any 
> non-portableness to darwin of mudflap?  I started from 89 passes... > :-)
>
> I fixed most all the obvious issues that appeared due to darwin from 
> looking at the build result and looking at the libmudflap.log file.  
> If someone would like to help track down the issues, I'd be interested 
> in hearing from you.

I did a wc -c to ensure that the file was there, and what its size 
was...  and then I sent that proof onto the list...  :-(

Here is the real file:

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: libmudflap.log.bz
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 15516 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/attachments/20050318/2c9a0f51/attachment.obj>