Libstdc++-v3 vs darwin vs weak support

[Andrew Pinski]

On Mar 15, 2005, at 8:01 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:

> Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
>> There are other targets other than aix that still need them too.
>> Almost all non elf targets (and there might be some elf targets too).
>> AIX 5.1 supports weak symbols (IIRC) and should work without the 
>> "hack"
>> but older AIX still should be supported.
>
> Thanks Andrew for the info. Which targets, exactly? I mean, how many 
> actually able to build and run correctly libstdc++-v3, anyway? I don't 
> see much in testresults... Indeed, I gather that for now we have to 
> keep that ugly machinery, but in 1 year, for instance?

I build on i686-pc-openbsd3.1 everyday which does not use elf and does 
not
support weak at all but I messed up the mail system so it is not 
sending the
testresults out.  I will try to fix that next week when I have time.  
But I
know the libstdc++ results are okay, there are failures but most of 
them are
related to wchar_t support.

I think djgg does not support weak symbols either and I have not seen 
any test
results from that target lately.


-- Pinski