C++ [RFC] taking address of a static const data member

[Andrew Pinski]

On Mar 11, 2005, at 2:16 PM, Fariborz Jahanian wrote:
> So, is g++ correct in rejecting this seemingly good user code?

Yes you need a place to store the data.
So for an example in your original testcase, you need:
const int Foo::foo;

Which fixes the problem and yes 9.4.2 explains this (I cannot find it 
right
now but I know there has been multiple bugs about this in the past).

-- Pinski