Strange missing tree constant propagation

[Andrew Pinski]

On Mar 10, 2005, at 6:23 AM, Zdenek Dvorak wrote:

> I think I will try the later fix today (mostly because I no longer
> remember what exactly were the problems that lead me to introducing
> the TREE_OVERFLOW check to is_gimple_min_invariant).

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-12/msg00786.html
And yes the testcase still fails when you remove TREE_OVERFLOW from
is_gimple_min_invariant, at least it did three weeks ago when I tried
this.


-- Pinski