[OT] __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
Duncan Sands
baldrick@free.fr
Tue Mar 8 13:31:00 GMT 2005
Hi Robert,
> Well if you tell me there are people about there implementing cpow
> with log and exp, that's enough for me to decide that Ada should
> continue to stay away (the Ada RM has accuracy requirements that
> would preclude a broken implementation of this kind) :-)
the reference manual allows for a "relaxed mode", which doesn't have
those accuracy requirements. I guess -ffast-math and the use of
builtins would be appropriate in the relaxed mode. Do you plan to
implement such a mode one day?
Just curious.
All the best,
Duncan.
More information about the Gcc
mailing list