__builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))

[Ronny Peine]

This proof is absolutely correct and in no way bogus, it is lectured to 
nearly every mathematics student PERIOD
But you are right, if the standards handles this otherwise, then this 
doesn't help in any case.

Robert Dewar wrote:
> Ronny Peine wrote:
> 
>> I hope that this make things clearer for some who don't believe 0^0 = 
>> 1 in the real case.
> 
> 
> Believe??? so now its a matter of religeon. Anyway, your bogus proof is
> irrelevant for the real case, since the language standard is clear in
> the real case anyway. It really is completely pointless to argue this
> from a mathematical point of view, the only proper viewpoint is that
> of the standard. You would do better to go read that!
> 
>