__LDBL_MAX__ exceeds range of 'long double'

[James E Wilson]

Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Sorry for the late reply. It does indeed fix the problem I saw with 4.0
> on FreeBSD, but I'm now seeing this with 3.4.4 20050228 too, so I think
> it's a regression introduced in the last 6 weeks or so.
> Is the same fix safe to apply to 3.4?

Yes, it should also be safe for gcc-3.4.

This problem was exposed in gcc-3.4 by this patch, which is presumably 
the same patch that exposed this on mainline.

2004-11-12  Richard Henderson  <rth@redhat.com>
 

         PR 17778
         * config/i386/i386.h (TARGET_96_ROUND_53_LONG_DOUBLE): New.
         * config/i386/freebsd.h (SUBTARGET_OVERRIDE_OPTIONS): Remove.
         (TARGET_96_ROUND_53_LONG_DOUBLE): New.
         * config/i386/i386-modes.def (XF): Use it.

My patch is needed to make this work with -E or --save-temps.  Since 
this is a clear regression, and a relatively safe patch, I will test the 
patch with gcc-3.4 and then check it in if there is no problem.
-- 
Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.SpecifixInc.com