Question regarding c++ constructors
Mike Stump
mrs@apple.com
Tue Mar 1 19:42:00 GMT 2005
On Feb 21, 2005, at 3:45 AM, Mile Davidovic wrote:
> Functions are completely the same.
> What is the reason for such compilere behaviour?
Just lack of code in the compiler to do better, see
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-08/msg00354.html for some of the
details and starting point, should you want to develop the code
further.... With that compiler, one can get:
__ZN4testC2Ev:
LFB4:
b __ZN4testC4Ev
LFE4:
.align 2
.globl __ZN4testC1Ev
.section __TEXT,__text,regular,pure_instructions
.align 2
__ZN4testC1Ev:
LFB6:
b __ZN4testC4Ev
LFE6:
.align 2
.globl __ZN4testC4Ev
.section __TEXT,__text,regular,pure_instructions
.align 2
__ZN4testC4Ev:
LFB7:
blr
LFE7:
While this case doesn't show it, imagine if the code were long to very
long, the savings increase.
More information about the Gcc
mailing list