Inlining and estimate_num_insns

[Jan Hubicka]

> On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 13:30:41 +0100, Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 02:03:57 +0100, Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz> wrote:
> > >
> > > > OK, I will put this higher in the TODO list (but this is not 4.0
> > > > either).  What was those less unrealistic tests?  I remember seeing node
> > > > removal in profiles, but edge removal comes first here.  Looks like I
> > > > finally recovered everything from disc crash so will have time to look
> > > > into this in the rest of the week...
> > >
> > > I see those functions high up in the profiles with tramp3d and leafify turned
> > > on, too.  I remember bugging you about this a few month ago...
> > >
> > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-11/msg00737.html
> > 
> > OK, thanks, this time I will remember this ;))  I believe that I
> > oprofiled it that shot remove_edge down from profile, but I have to
> > re-try.
> 
> Try this,. bootstrapped on i686-pc-linux-gnu in progress.

Looks nice, you might also consider turing next_clone list into doubly
linked list to speedup remove_node somewhat.  Not sure how much that
one counts.  Can you post --disable-checking benchmarks on your testcase
with leafify?

Honza
> 
> Richard.