Q about Ada and value ranges in types
Richard Kenner
kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu
Tue Jun 28 02:28:00 GMT 2005
RTH has been suggesting to use build_int_cst (etype, 0) instead.
Indeed. I was trying to minimize the change, but such cleanups are always
useful. This was also missing a protection on INTEGER_TYPE_P. I just got
a good bootstrap of Ada on x86_64 with this and a patch from Diego to fix
the other problem and also remove the kludge that's fixed by this.
More information about the Gcc
mailing list