How to replace -O1 with corresponding -f's?

[Andrew Pinski]

On Jun 20, 2005, at 11:28 AM, Sergei Organov wrote:

> Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu> writes:
>
>> On Jun 20, 2005, at 10:54 AM, Sergei Organov wrote:
>>
>>> so SYMBOL_FLAG_SMALL (flags 0x6 vs 0x2) is somehow being missed when 
>>> -O1
>>
>>> is turned on. Seems to be something at tree-to-RTX conversion time.
>>> Constant folding?
>>
>> No, it would mean that the target says that this is not a small data.
>> Also try it with the following code and you will see there is no 
>> difference:
>>
>>          double osvf() { return 314314314; }
>
> There is no difference in the sense that here both -O0 and -O1 behave
> roughly the same. So the problem is with detecting "smallness" for true
> constants by the target, right?

I think the bug is in rs6000_elf_in_small_data_p but since I have not
debuged it yet I don't know for sure.

Could you file a bug?  This is a target bug.

-- Pinski