Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters
Gabriel Dos Reis
gdr@integrable-solutions.net
Mon Jun 20 12:09:00 GMT 2005
Michael Veksler <VEKSLER@il.ibm.com> writes:
| [Gaby wants Vincent to explain:]
| Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc@vinc17.org> writes:
| # This is complete non-sense. One doesn't prepare a patch for an invalid
| # bug.
|
| [Michael tries to interpret Vincent:]
| | I think that what Vincent meant was:
| | "One doesn't prepare a patch for a PR marked as INVALID".
|
|
| Gabriel Dos Reis wrote on 19/06/2005 19:06:13:
| > Then let me explain my previous message. Either
| >
| > (1) Vincent thinks it is an invalid bug, then
| >
| > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-06/msg00818.html
| >
| > (2) or Vincent thinks it is NOT an invalid bug, then
| >
| > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-06/msg00803.html
| >
|
| I don't see a contradiction. All he is trying to say that it is
| a valid bug marked as INVALID. His claims that a patch will
| be ignored if the PR is marked as INVALID make sense to me.
But, that is not the claim he made.
-- Gaby
More information about the Gcc
mailing list