Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing)

[Robert Dewar]

Scott Robert Ladd wrote:

> No, what they do is redefine the bug such that it is no longer a bug.
> Certain U.S. Presidents are quite fond of this tactic, recategorizing
> things to avoid dealing with them. Bug 323 is an example of how GCC does
> this.

I don't know of any example of this. That is a case where something is
clearly a non-conformance with the language definition, and has been
declared not a bug.