What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point]
Andreas Schwab
schwab@suse.de
Wed Jun 1 08:42:00 GMT 2005
Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc@vinc17.org> writes:
> On 2005-06-01 00:58:25 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> #include <assert.h>
>> #include <float.h>
>>
>> long double one = 1.0;
>> long double one_plus_eps;
>>
>> int
>> main (void)
>> {
>> long double one_plus_eps;
>>
>> one_plus_eps = one + LDBL_EPSILON;
>> assert (one != one_plus_eps);
>> return 0;
>> }
>
> I don't know how the standard should be interpreted (see below), but
> if your program fails, this means that either your program is buggy
> or the C implemention is buggy.
This works fine with a non-broken implementation which claims IEC 60559
compliance.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, MaxfeldstraÃe 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
More information about the Gcc
mailing list