GCC-3.4.5 status report

[Kean Johnston]

> Here is how Mark and I have agreed on those sort of things.  If such a
> patch is accepted in 3.4.x but not in 4.0.x, then we've introduced a
> regression in 4.0.x. 
> So, the way we deal with it is that, the patch is first applied to
> 4.0.x, then to 3.4.x retrospectively.  Is that workable for you?
Absolutely. I actually did all the workin in a 4.0.2 cvs tree, and
Im backporting it to my 3.4.5 tree.

Kean