GCC 4.1 Status Report (2005-07-22)

[Andrew Pinski]

On Jul 22, 2005, at 5:05 PM, Mark Mitchell wrote:

> Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> On Jul 22, 2005, at 4:22 PM, Mark Mitchell wrote:
>>> There are 225 regressions open against GCC 4.1.  About half of these
>>> (119) are not regressions in 4.0, i.e., they are new regressions
>>> introduced in the course of 4.1.  While it does seem that the
>>> regression rate has declined slightly from 4.0, it still seems rather
>>> high.
>> I wonder if this includes the ones targeted against 3.4.x which adds
>> about another 50 or so bugs.
>
> You're correct -- I omitted those.  In theory, there should be no such 
> bugs; they should all be targeted at 4.0.2 instead, if they apply to 
> 4.[01].  (That's the policy that Gaby and I have been using.)

Should I move them?

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski