Minimum target alignment for a datatype

[Richard Henderson]

On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 11:30:40AM -0700, Chris Lattner wrote:
> Understood.  I'm just looking for the minimum type alignment without  
> user alignment.  It appears that this is impossible to get from the  
> targets, due to the way the targets can override type alignments in  
> (almost completely) general ways.  Is this true?

For !STRICT_ALIGNMENT, there is no interesting minimum.


r~