Function inlining for FORTRAN
Paul Brook
paul@codesourcery.com
Wed Jul 20 16:03:00 GMT 2005
On Wednesday 20 July 2005 16:52, Joost VandeVondele wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't think Paul's example is completely correct, I've created PR22571
> with some more info.
Ah, this makes thing somewhat simpler. For some reason I though my example was
legal.
I think this makes it possible to implement my option (a). Ie. use the same
type for all derived types that are "the same". This basically means where we
create global function DECLs we also want to create global type declarations
for derived types, and the type munging of function arguments becomes a
no-op.
Some trickey may still be needed for modules, but that's a slightly different
issue.
Paul
More information about the Gcc
mailing list