volatile semantics

[Gabriel Dos Reis]

Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org> writes:

| On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 00:05 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org> writes:
| > 
| > [...]
| > 
| > | You make it sound like  the standard is crystal clear on this issue, and
| > | everyone who disagrees with your viewpoint are just slimeballs trying to
| > | get around the clear wording of the standard.
| > 
| > I think you're profondly mistaken in your understanding of what I wrote.
| 
| I read it another few times, and still looks the same to me.
| 
| "The way I see it is that people who designed and wrote the standard
| offer their view and interpretation of of they wrote and some people
| are determined to offer a different interpretation so that they can
| claim they are well-founded to apply  their transformations."
| 
| 
| IE there are those whose opinion is right because "they wrote the

see, here is where you added the transmutation.

-- Gaby