Where does the C standard describe overflow of signed integers?

[Georg Bauhaus]

Paul Schlie wrote:

>>From: Georg Bauhaus <bauhaus@futureapps.de>
>>    
>>
>>>Paul Schlie wrote:
>>>      
>>>
>>>>From: Robert Dewar <dewar@adacore.com>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>> this would mean you could not put local variables in
>>>>registers. the effect on code quality woul be awful!
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>Why would anyone care about the performance of an access to an
>>>un-initialized variable? 
>>>      
>>>
>>You can have both, correctness and uninitialised local
>>variables. For an impression of the difference in performance,
>>    
>>

>- which predominantly illustrates the effect of volatile semantics?
>  
>
I was looking for a way to stop GCC from using registers,
as I wanted to see one of the above mentioned effects
on code quality. Hence volatile.


-- Georg