gcc 4.1 compile time and memory usage graphs
Daniel Berlin
dberlin@dberlin.org
Sun Jul 10 13:07:00 GMT 2005
On Sun, 2005-07-10 at 16:46 +0400, Serge Belyshev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have measured compilation time and memory usage of mainline on x86_64
> from 2005-02-25 to 2005-07-10 with one day interval.
So does Jan, and to be honest, his tester is better than your graphs,
because it knows the difference between ggc and non-ggc memory, etc.
Looking at Jan's tester shows that Diego's patch to make the new pt
solver the default wiped out some of my improvements from the decl
hierarchy
See
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2005-07/msg00031.html
vs
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2005-07/msg00030.html
A lot of this is probably because the constraint graph is currently ggc
alloced.
I'll fix that in a moment.
More information about the Gcc
mailing list