On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 03:24:23PM -0800, Steve Ellcey wrote: > ... but I also see a comment that this is > intended to be called before the function prologue and it is not clear > to me that there is any sensible way to call this routine after the > function prologue. I think that comment is in error. We currently call it after the prologue, and it works. r~