forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking

[Marcin Dalecki]

On 2005-01-26, at 23:20, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:

>>    With the same version of gcc, and glibc even - *without* the
>>    patches that SuSE supplies.
>>
>> Then it is SuSE's fault that they apply patches that make things
>> incompatible.  So go blame them instead.
>
>    I'm not 'blaming' anybody, just pointing out observations.
>
> So point it out to the SuSE folks, because it isn't the problem of
> glibc or gcc if SuSE applies patches that make things incompatible.
>
Uninformed that you are you are misguiding people to waist their time.
You have no clue. There is no "official" glibc release
out there remotely compatible with kernel 2.6 and gcc 3.4. Thus there 
isn't
anything out there SuSE could be incompatible with.