Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
Daniel Berlin
dberlin@dberlin.org
Tue Jan 25 19:11:00 GMT 2005
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Adrian Robert wrote:
>> In fairness, the Steering Committe did however make a conscious
>> decision not to designate Objective-C a release-critical language.
>> That is because there are more features in GCC (support for
>> languages, chips, optimizations, etc.) than there are people to
>> maintain them all -- especially to keep them all working all the
>> time in all possible cross products.
>
> Thank you for taking the time to clarify the situation. But..
>
> Regardless of how you sugar-coat it, designating a language as not
> release critical means in practice you can't rely on GCC going
> forward for that language. And when there are manpower shortages,
> the situation is not likely to improve -- rather, the gaps that need
> to be filled for support to return will increase.
How many times does it have to be said that GCC is a volunteer project.
Regardless of how you classify objective C, release critical or not,
people are not going to start randomly fixing objective C bugs.
The only way objective C will be up to snuff, regardless of whether it is
classified as a release critical platform or not, is if people who care
about it contribute patches.
It's that simple.
--Dan
More information about the Gcc
mailing list