Objective-C bugs and GCC releases

Steven Bosscher stevenb@suse.de
Tue Jan 25 17:02:00 GMT 2005


On Tuesday 25 January 2005 17:13, Helge Hess wrote:
> On Jan 25, 2005, at 16:32, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> > You're forgetting that this is a volunteer project.  We can't force
> > developers to work on something they don't want to work on.
>
> Every project has rules which need to be followed, even by volunteers.
> And in the past is was usual behaviour, if not unwritten law, not to
> break other people's stuff.

Nobody broke other people's stuff.  Other people's stuff was itself
broken and it just happened to work with some luck.

> Sure, modifications are allowed, but if you change something you need
> to take care it doesn't affect other parts _of the same project_. And
> cc1obj _is_ (still?) a part of GCC.

So is C/C++, so perhaps you can convince the people pushing ObjC++
that your argument is valid.  We have already tried that without luck.

> I think thats pretty much the usual way how all projects work.

It is also how GCC works.

> Its a 
> matter of fairness with the other project members.

You seem to imply some project members treat objc unfair, but you just
so miss the point.

Gr.
Steven



More information about the Gcc mailing list