PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev?

[Richard Guenther]

On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote:

> > I did leave in the
> >   if (firstinsideloop ^ secondinsideloop)
>
> This is pretty much what i'm testing now.

This helps - though for the particular function there is now

Insertions:0
New PHIs:0
Eliminated:0
Constified:0

but I didn't expect any obvious redundant computations in the
function anyway.

--
Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at uni-tuebingen dot de>
WWW: http://www.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de/~rguenth/