fold_builtin_memcpy cannot optimize <retval>?
Mark Mitchell
mark@codesourcery.com
Fri Jan 21 20:55:00 GMT 2005
Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> On Jan 21, 2005, at 2:37 PM, Mark Mitchell wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure. I seemed to believe in that thread that they could
>> never be NULL, but I'm not sure if everyone agreed, and I see that we
>> suggested a non-NULL tag on objects somewhere. So, in that case,
>> there may be no difference at all to the middle-end. In any case, I
>> think that it would make sense for us to allow a REFERENCE_TYPE
>> anywhere we allow a POINTER_TYPE.
>
>
>
> Isn't this valid C++ then (or is it just undefined):
It's undefined. You dereferenced a NULL pointer.
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304
More information about the Gcc
mailing list