What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0

Toon Moene toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl
Fri Jan 14 21:49:00 GMT 2005


Bernd Schmidt wrote:

> Jeffrey A Law wrote:

>> If reload is going to hang around (and I suspect it will), I'd love to
>> see those two areas improved.  I can't express how difficult I find
>> it to analyze the reload inheritance code.  Reload ordering is only
>> mildly easier to understand.
> 
> I'm attaching a proof-of-concept patch, against a checkout from 
> 20050106.  The main things this patch does

I meant to reply to Bernd earlier that I would really, really like his 
patch, if for nothing else than that it would simplify reload[1].c so as 
to make it more easily replaceable.  Bernd has shown in the past that he 
knows his way around reload, so I would appreciate if this patch could 
be hammered into something that might be useful (if only in 4.1).

Thanks,

-- 
Toon Moene - e-mail: toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phone: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG  Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
Maintainer, GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html
A maintainer of GNU Fortran 95: http://gcc.gnu.org/fortran/



More information about the Gcc mailing list