New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version 1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).)

[Robert Dewar]

Vladius wrote:

>    It is not professionally made. It looks like a vector package test, 
> but not as a final result. I don't say it is very bad, but it is not 
> good, I'm quite sure.
>    New logo meets those, I think.

I strongly agree with the sentiment that the proposed new "logo" is
quite unsuitable. It is indeed more like work of art, than a logo,
and I find it quite unsuitable. I really don't see what objective
is being attempted.
> 
>> As is, without going through that discussion in advance, I think there 
>> is zero change that your pictures will be accepted as a new logo.
> 
> 
>    I hope You are wrong.

He is absolutely right, you seem to regard a logo as a piece of
art. It is not, it is a commercial/social/political/advertising
symbol :-) And you have to decide what you are trying to achieve.