What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0

[Andrew Pinski]

On Jan 6, 2005, at 8:25 PM, Sam Lauber wrote:

> In my opinion, new-ra has gotten so bad because no one has
> bothered to try it or debug it. -fnew-ra on nontrival code
> in 3.4.3 works perfectly well! One of the points of the
> development model gcc and many other free software packages
> use is everyone is encouraged to try it, break it, debug it,
> and fix it.

Well nobody wants to update which is why it got bit rotten like
most other source which gets bit rotten.
If you want to debug it and fix it, go ahead but nobody else
wanted to do it.


-- Pinski