some remarks about gcc4.0

[Steven Bosscher]

On Jan 06, 2005 01:46 PM, tbp <tbptbp@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:13:18 -0800, Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Keep filing bugs, and we'll fix them.
> If i'm not mistaken

Oh but you are.

> missed optimizations don't have a high priority

Some do.  Some don't.

> and really really hurt Real World performance;

Some do.  Some don't.

Missed optimizations should be given a priority based on their
severeness.  Your bug looks like it could be bumped a bit because
it is not just a missed optimization but a more-or-less latent
real bug.


> ie
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19252

Even if it doesn't say it's high priority in bugzilla, that doesn't
mean there isn't anyone interested in fixing it.  Apparently Uros is
already on it.

Gr.
Steven