[i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?

[Denis Zaitsev]

On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 11:44:33PM +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Denis Zaitsev <zzz@anda.ru> writes:
> 
> | > | Ok, but do we force users to use libm every time libc is used?
> | > 
> | > What is libc?  How do you define it?
> | 
> | I assume GLIBC, of course.  For x86, but I don't know either this
> | matters.
> 
> That is a very narrow definition; however, are you claiming that the
> mathematical functions are not part of GLIBC?

Of course no, I'm not.