Florian Weimer wrote:
> No, There are two possible variadic declarations for printf in this
> case:
>
> void printf (char *, ...);
>
> and
>
> void printf (char *, int, ...);
Is this really a problem in practice. If so, I completely withdraw
the suggestion, it's too messy to distinguish these cases.
Actually, there must be a third one
void printf (...);
no?