[i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?

[Andrew Pinski]

On Jan 4, 2005, at 5:59 PM, Denis Zaitsev wrote:

> Ok, but do we force users to use libm every time libc is used?  No, we
> don't.  Of course, we don't.  And I emphasised the word 'always':
> not _every_ routine from libstdc++ need libm, but it always
> required...

Then write a better collect2 which only links in the libraries which
are needed and have it find the needed libraries without supplying
the option to link the library (yes this is on the TODO page of gcc).

Also note on some targets like darwin, libm is included in libsystem 
(aka
libc) by default.


-- Pinski