-funsafe-loop-optimizations
Mark Mitchell
mark@codesourcery.com
Tue Jan 4 18:57:00 GMT 2005
David Edelsohn wrote:
> While we discuss whether this should be the default or enabled at
> any optimization level, can we agree that users should be able to assert
> with a commandline option that they want less strict induction variable
> semantics? I hope that we can move forward with an option to address
> these performance regressions and allow users to request this optimzation
> when they *do* want it, along the lines of the draft patch.
I would certainly agree. I think the first thing to do is to get a
patch that implements the semantics we want, in the aggressive mode;
then, we can decide whether we want it to be the default at some
optimization level or not.
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304
More information about the Gcc
mailing list