What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0

Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
Mon Jan 3 19:58:00 GMT 2005


Daniel Berlin wrote:

> Bingo.
> Heck, i helped write it and i agree.
> new-ra has failed, long live a new new-ra

I agree; the new-ra code should be removed before 4.0, or, at least, the 
option and associated documentation should be removed.  It's not useful 
to users to have this option, as it doesn't work.

Patches to implement either of the above options are pre-approved.

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304



More information about the Gcc mailing list