What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0

[Daniel Berlin]

On Sun, 2 Jan 2005, Paul Brook wrote:

> On Sunday 02 January 2005 13:57,  Björn Haase  wrote:
>> concerning 'it's not like anyone will miss it' :
>>
>> For the avr target, new-ra used to be *extremely* useful. There have been
>> discussions about the -fnew-ra issue. Unfortunately not on this list but on
>> some of the specialized lists for the avr targets, iirc. Maybe we should
>> cross post summaries of our discussions also at this list.?
>
> I don't think anyone is disagreeing that gcc needs a new register allocator
> The suggestion is that the "new-ra" on mainline is sufficiently broken that
> it's better to rip it out and either start again or fix it on a branch than
> leave it to bitrot and get in the way on mainline.

Bingo.
Heck, i helped write it and i agree.
new-ra has failed, long live a new new-ra