Might a -native-semantics switch, forcing native target optimization semantics, be reasonable?

[Mike Stump]

On Dec 31, 2005, at 10:51 AM, Paul Schlie wrote:
> As although C/C++ define some expressions as having undefined  
> semantics;

I'd rather it be called --do-what-i-mean.  :-)

Could you give us a hint at what all the semantics you would want to  
change with this option?  Are their any code bases that you're trying  
to compile?  Compilers that you're trying to be compatible with?