PR 25512: pointer overflow defined?

Andrew Haley aph@redhat.com
Wed Dec 21 18:52:00 GMT 2005


Gabriel Dos Reis writes:
 > Robert Dewar <dewar@adacore.com> writes:
 > 
 > | >However, we have an obligation to define what those mappings are.
 > | >
 > | Why?
 > 
 > Because it is an implementation-defined behaviour and we have to
 > document how the choice is made.

Can you state some language in the standard that says we have to do
this?

Andrew.



More information about the Gcc mailing list