PR 25512: pointer overflow defined?

[Andrew Pinski]

On Dec 21, 2005, at 2:43 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:

> Robert Dewar <dewar@adacore.com> writes:
>
> | >However, we have an obligation to define what those mappings are.
> | >
> | Why?
>
> Because it is an implementation-defined behaviour and we have to
> document how the choice is made.

We actually document the C behavior.

We don't document the C++ implementation behavior because well no one 
cares
enough to do it.

-- Pinski