gfc_build_addr_expr vs. build_fold_addr_expr{,_with_type}

[Richard Guenther]

On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, FX Coudert wrote:

> > The only downside I see with this type of patch is that backporting
> > fixes from trunk to 4.1 will be more difficult.  With only a small
> > group of active gfortran hackers, this may place 4.1 into position
> > of low maintenance. 
> 
> Unless I am mistaken, this patch doesn't touch anything outside the fortran/
> front-end, so I think we can consider backporting it to 4.1.

As less intrusive first step I can bring the fortran variants in line
with the middle-end ones, especially wrt correctness.  We at least
should correct these issues.

Richard.