RELOAD_OTHER bug?

[Joern RENNECKE]

DJ Delorie wrote:

>>No, anything merged with RELOAD_OTHER has to be RELOAD_OTHER.
>>    
>>
>
>Why?
>  
>
RELOAD_FOR_OTHER_ADDRESS only lives till the RELOAD_OTHER input reloads.

>Does this mean that RELOAD_FOR_OTHER_ADDRESS reloads can never be
>merged with RELOAD_OTHER reloads?
>  
>
Yes.  But if they load the same value as a RELOAD_OTHER input, they can 
share the same reload register.