[PATCH] New predicate covering NOP_EXPR and CONVERT_EXPR

[Giovanni Bajo]

Richard Kenner <kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> wrote:

>      Java has to be fixed (probably with a frontend-specific tree code),
>      and maybe also Ada.
> 
> Ada does not.  It generates CONVERT_EXPR vs. NOP_EXPR in some attempt
> to preserve some old-semantic difference but always treats them the
> same when looking at trees.


This is a jolly good news to me, thanks.
-- 
Giovanni Bajo