4.2 Project: "@file" support

[Scott Robert Ladd]

Tristan Wibberley wrote:
> I certainly agree with (a). For (b), I think a gcc compiler that is
> intended to produce normal Windows binaries should have the same
> commandline interface as Microsoft's compiler (I mean *all* of the
> commandline interface) - for build scripts and development environments
> that expect to see Micrsoft's tools.

This isn;t that difficult to do now -- on Windows, I wrote a wrapper to 
mask the underlying compiler, so that tools expecting MSVC work 
transparently with Intel and GCC compilers. Emulating Microsoft exactly 
doesn't need to be part of GCC itself.

That said, I am a supported of the @file concept in GCC, since it has 
uses beyond simple MSVC compatibility.

..Scott